Seller Forums
user profile
Seller_pHv3L2i12xVbP

Return item after 18 months of use

We received a returned printer from a customer after 18 months of use in a damaged condition. It is unclear how this item was accepted by Amazon in the first place. After submitting all the required details through the Safe-T claim process, the claim was rejected with the reason “CR-Defective.” Despite multiple appeals, the claim continued to be denied.

We then opened a case with Seller Support and provided complete photo evidence and supporting information. The response we received was as follows:

"Kindly note that, in accordance with Amazon’s FBA Customer Returns Policy, we strive to ensure a great customer experience by occasionally accepting returns beyond the standard timeframe outlined in our policies."

This essentially means the entire loss is placed on the seller, even when the return is clearly abusive. In this case, the customer misused the system RETURNING ITEM AFTER 18 MONTHS and Amazon took no action to prevent it. Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident—we have already incurred significant financial losses in similar cases.

398 views
15 replies
Tags:Return shipment
90
Reply
user profile
Seller_pHv3L2i12xVbP

Return item after 18 months of use

We received a returned printer from a customer after 18 months of use in a damaged condition. It is unclear how this item was accepted by Amazon in the first place. After submitting all the required details through the Safe-T claim process, the claim was rejected with the reason “CR-Defective.” Despite multiple appeals, the claim continued to be denied.

We then opened a case with Seller Support and provided complete photo evidence and supporting information. The response we received was as follows:

"Kindly note that, in accordance with Amazon’s FBA Customer Returns Policy, we strive to ensure a great customer experience by occasionally accepting returns beyond the standard timeframe outlined in our policies."

This essentially means the entire loss is placed on the seller, even when the return is clearly abusive. In this case, the customer misused the system RETURNING ITEM AFTER 18 MONTHS and Amazon took no action to prevent it. Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident—we have already incurred significant financial losses in similar cases.

Tags:Return shipment
90
398 views
15 replies
Reply
15 replies
user profile
Adam_Amazon_

Hello @Seller_pHv3L2i12xVbP,

Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. I'd be happy to look into this further for you. Could you please provide the case ID and reference number associated with the safe-t claim? That will help me research the details and see what options may be available.

Adam

10
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity
user profile
Seller_pHv3L2i12xVbP

Return item after 18 months of use

We received a returned printer from a customer after 18 months of use in a damaged condition. It is unclear how this item was accepted by Amazon in the first place. After submitting all the required details through the Safe-T claim process, the claim was rejected with the reason “CR-Defective.” Despite multiple appeals, the claim continued to be denied.

We then opened a case with Seller Support and provided complete photo evidence and supporting information. The response we received was as follows:

"Kindly note that, in accordance with Amazon’s FBA Customer Returns Policy, we strive to ensure a great customer experience by occasionally accepting returns beyond the standard timeframe outlined in our policies."

This essentially means the entire loss is placed on the seller, even when the return is clearly abusive. In this case, the customer misused the system RETURNING ITEM AFTER 18 MONTHS and Amazon took no action to prevent it. Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident—we have already incurred significant financial losses in similar cases.

398 views
15 replies
Tags:Return shipment
90
Reply
user profile
Seller_pHv3L2i12xVbP

Return item after 18 months of use

We received a returned printer from a customer after 18 months of use in a damaged condition. It is unclear how this item was accepted by Amazon in the first place. After submitting all the required details through the Safe-T claim process, the claim was rejected with the reason “CR-Defective.” Despite multiple appeals, the claim continued to be denied.

We then opened a case with Seller Support and provided complete photo evidence and supporting information. The response we received was as follows:

"Kindly note that, in accordance with Amazon’s FBA Customer Returns Policy, we strive to ensure a great customer experience by occasionally accepting returns beyond the standard timeframe outlined in our policies."

This essentially means the entire loss is placed on the seller, even when the return is clearly abusive. In this case, the customer misused the system RETURNING ITEM AFTER 18 MONTHS and Amazon took no action to prevent it. Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident—we have already incurred significant financial losses in similar cases.

Tags:Return shipment
90
398 views
15 replies
Reply
user profile

Return item after 18 months of use

by Seller_pHv3L2i12xVbP

We received a returned printer from a customer after 18 months of use in a damaged condition. It is unclear how this item was accepted by Amazon in the first place. After submitting all the required details through the Safe-T claim process, the claim was rejected with the reason “CR-Defective.” Despite multiple appeals, the claim continued to be denied.

We then opened a case with Seller Support and provided complete photo evidence and supporting information. The response we received was as follows:

"Kindly note that, in accordance with Amazon’s FBA Customer Returns Policy, we strive to ensure a great customer experience by occasionally accepting returns beyond the standard timeframe outlined in our policies."

This essentially means the entire loss is placed on the seller, even when the return is clearly abusive. In this case, the customer misused the system RETURNING ITEM AFTER 18 MONTHS and Amazon took no action to prevent it. Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident—we have already incurred significant financial losses in similar cases.

Tags:Return shipment
90
398 views
15 replies
Reply
15 replies
15 replies
Quick filters
Sort by
user profile
Adam_Amazon_

Hello @Seller_pHv3L2i12xVbP,

Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. I'd be happy to look into this further for you. Could you please provide the case ID and reference number associated with the safe-t claim? That will help me research the details and see what options may be available.

Adam

10
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity
user profile
Adam_Amazon_

Hello @Seller_pHv3L2i12xVbP,

Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. I'd be happy to look into this further for you. Could you please provide the case ID and reference number associated with the safe-t claim? That will help me research the details and see what options may be available.

Adam

10
user profile
Adam_Amazon_

Hello @Seller_pHv3L2i12xVbP,

Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. I'd be happy to look into this further for you. Could you please provide the case ID and reference number associated with the safe-t claim? That will help me research the details and see what options may be available.

Adam

10
Reply
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity